2 Jan
2013
2 Jan
'13
6:27 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:19:25PM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
In fact, this *shouldn't* be an issue in that the OS have agreed
to terms which I believe will be DFSG-free. The changes haven't
quite been accepted by the Debian ftp-masters, but I'm hoping that's
just a matter of time:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libgeo-coordinates-osgb-perl_2.04-2.html
As far as deploying 0.70 on oxford.openguides.org; I'll be doing this
in about a week after I've run a version of 0.65 with backported
Leaflet changes (see [1] for why) for some more testing. The 0.70 package
has just been uploaded to Debian experimental.
Cheers,
Dominic.
[1] <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697184>
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:39:47AM +0100, Dominic
Hargreaves wrote:
which i have responded to.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:27:43PM +0100, Dominic
Hargreaves wrote:
libtemplate-perl is up to date, but the next stumbling block is that
I have not been able to upload libgeo-coordinates-osgb-perl to Debian,
since it has not been found to meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
As a result I plan to upload it to non-free instead (at least until
someone can tell me that it should go in main) but this means that
Openguides will need tweaking to suit:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/307
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49:55AM +0100, Kake
wrote:
>Some of us were hoping to talk about the Oxford Guide at the
>next-but-one Oxford Geek Night (in July), but if the guide can't be
>upgraded before then, there's not much point in us going and telling
>people about all of OpenGuides' new shiny features...
I will make sure that the Oxford guide is running current Openguides
by July.
I should probably follow up on this. libtemplate-perl is still out of
date in Debian and this fact, combined with the fact that there isn't
going to be an OpenGuides presence at Oxford Geek Night next month
after all means I haven't done this yet. But it's still on my radar. If the project thinks this change shouldn't be
made in OpenGuides
it could be maintained as a patch in the Debian package, although
regardless of legal complexities it's probably worth streamlining
the installation a bit to avoid installing modules that may not be
used.
I think its a change we shouldnt make in the CPAN version. The code
deals with it not being there. A debian patch can remove the hard
dep on it.
the test will also probably need the skips put back in place or
debian can rmeove those test files entirely.