Good idea Ivor.
> > 4. Working the Metatags even further. At the moment the contents of
> > our (as in the OGMK) description tags is pretty sparse, and wholly
> > dependent on the contents of the "Description of this node" field.
> > Pumping the first 150 chars of the article content into the
> > description metatag after whatever the "description of this node"
> > field contains, would give search engines more to go on.
>
> This is what the page summary is for, no?
Indeed. However loads of ours are blank, or too short to make really
good description metatag content. Something like: If the page summary
is less than X chars long, then making it up to 150 chars using page
content and with a ... at the end to signify truncation" would be a
bonus I'm sure.
Cheers.
Tom.