On Tue 19 Aug 2008, Thomas Klausner <domm(a)cpan.org> wrote:
Well, I miss-phrased my assertion. What I meant was
"Usually a group of
people who get paid for their job do better then one or two volunteers
with no significant time (actually, no time at all...) to spend on the
project."
i.e. "people with time to spend on a project generally do better than
people with no time to spend on it"? :) I'd agree with that!
But still, too bad that it didn't work out for
Vienna, and it definitly
wasn't the fault of the software...
Yes, it is a shame, but thank you for trying to get it going!
Kake