On Mon 17 Aug 2009, Bob Walker <bob(a)randomness.org.uk> wrote:
The last few days I've been hacking together some
more tests and indeed
have now read our entire suite of tests. While I was doing this I noticed
that we seem to have several ways of doing things so it might be worth
deciding on the best. [...]
Finally a couple of the test files have useful subroutines in them whch
should probably be put into Openguides::Test.
So thoughts, questions or indeed comments?
Good work! I think the inconsistencies you've identified are
basically artefacts of the test suite having grown organically as and
when needed... we didn't have OpenGuides::Test to start with, and I'm
sure I remember thinking that at some point the older tests should be
refactored to remove all this repeated code.
I agree that as much as possible should be moved into utility subs in