26 Oct
2004
26 Oct
'04
10:22 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:17:22AM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
Okay. I was assuming that it would be possible to just clone stuff, so
that we end up with a new supersearch.cgi and a notverygoodsearch.cgi
left over with S::I support :)
I didn't realise that; that makes me feel happier about using it.
Cheers,
Dominic.
On Tue 26 Oct 2004, Dominic Hargreaves
<dom(a)earth.li> wrote:
Does retaining
S::I support impose a significant hassle now?
Yes. I know that
Simon has stepped away from maintaining his modules, so
it seems foolish to force our users to use Plucene with no
alternative at this stage.
As far as I know, Plucene is an important part of a lot of Kasei's code.
They are the maintainers now, and I doubt they're going to junk it.
Search::InvertedIndex however has essentially been abandoned by its
maintainer.