On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:00:34PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
On Fri 30 Mar 2007, Stephen Gower socks-openguides.org@earth.li wrote:
I think you [1] probably are, but I'm aware Dom's not here to comment at the moment and AIUI everything needs to be approved by him before it'll go into a release.
To clarify a little, from my understanding, additions to RDF aren't likely to be controversial, since RDF output is something of a moving target anyway, and it's just another output format so that layer can always be rewritten in the future - hence, RDF stuff that's asked for by an actual consumer such as Tom[0] is (I think) likely to go in, for the time being at least. (The lack of consensus among RDF consumers does, I think, mean that OpenGuides RDF output certainly shouldn't be regarded as anything approaching stable.)
I'm happy for those with an interest in RDF to take the lead on RDF support in OpenGuides so no particular comments about this :)
Cheers,
Dominic.