6 Jul
2007
6 Jul
'07
12:25 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 01:25:31PM +0100, Bob Walker wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Kake L Pugh wrote:
An alternative might be to show the last n edits instead of hardcoding to 6 months, but that's inconsistent with the normal Recent Changes output.
last 50 edits grouped accordingly.
Perhaps with a [more...] link to show 51-100 (with a [more...] link to show 101-150, etc)
It's great how these simple things suddenly become complicated, isn't it?!
s