29 Nov
2004
29 Nov
'04
9:57 p.m.
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Mart�n Ferrari wrote:
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 04:15, Kake L Pugh wrote:
I think the Mediawiki approach is a good one. You can, of course, create a separate namespace for comments, but I think it would be harder to do.
Isn't creating a separate namespace for comments ("Talk:Foo") exactly what Mediawiki does?
Well, not exactly as I see it, is more of a convention. A separate namespace could be implemented adding a nodetype metadata, so the comments page would be also Foo, but with nodetype=comments
If one kept comments in a second and separate database, having the node name be the same would work easily...
Justin