On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:39:11PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:01:28PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote: I might have a play with Subversion[1] too. Assuming the history can be imported well (which I believe it can be) would there be any interest in
It can be: look for "cvs2svn".
switching to that? For common use, subversion is very similar to CVS, but has a few nifty extra features, and is much more flexible in how it can be set up server-side.
I'm in favor of Subversion, if only because it means that I can checkout with just a URL. (CVS has always confused me, SVN doesn't.) However, branching in subversion is difficult: keep that in mind if you're going to need to branch.