> -----Original Message-----
> From: openguides-dev-bounces(a)openguides.org
> [mailto:openguides-dev-bounces@openguides.org]On Behalf Of Dominic
> Hargreaves
> Sent: 21 November 2005 15:25
> To: openguides-dev(a)openguides.org
> Subject: [OGDev] Re: [OpenGuides-Dev] Release, bugs,and
> Search::InvertedIndex support?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:06:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > Lastly, I would like to solicit comments on dropping support for
> > Search::InvertedIndex soon. My personal need for it no
> longer exists,
> > so I am tempted to drop it for 0.49 or thereabouts, but if
> people want
> > otherwise and can help with its continued support, then I
> am happy for
> > that too. So, if you currently use S::II, let me know your views.
>
> Noone replied to this, so I assume that noone needs
> Search::InvertedIndex any more.
>
> I will mark it as deprecated in SVN now, and remove support for it in
> release 0.53 (ie the one after next).
I think it's worth retaining the pluggability of searches, so that we could add alternative(s) to Plucene at some future stage. I had a problem with installing Plucene on one machine, and fell back to SII, but since resolved the problem with Plucene.
IMHO, it's nice to have an alternative to Plucene so that we can check it for anomalies in the search results, even though it's inferior.
By the way, any news on the proken compatibility with the latest Text::WikiFormat? I needed to dive into backpan to retrieve an old T::WF that worked with CGI::Wiki.
Ivor.