On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:39:19AM -0500, IvorW wrote:

IMHO, it's nice to have an alternative to Plucene so that we can check it for anomalies in the search results, even though it's inferior.

Sorry, I missed out replying to this paragraph.

I don't think this alone warrants retaining support for S::II. It adds extra layers of maintenance to OpenGuides and adds to the complexity of the install. I'm not sure S::II installs have even worked for quite some time.