#14: test failure with no plucene ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: dom | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: Component: openguides | Version: 0.47 Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Comment (by crschmidt@crschmidt.net):
Do we want to support non-plucene code anymore? Search::II was more of a PITA than it was worth, and I'm pretty sure most guides use Plucene these days.
openguides-tickets@lists.openguides.org