#28: dc:date and content-type invalid in RSS feed
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dom | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version: 0.51
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dom):
* summary: Missing reference to wiki xmlns. => dc:date and content-type
invalid in RSS feed
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/28>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#1: Review date field
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dom | Owner: dom
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by dom):
* status: new => assigned
* owner: => dom
Old description:
> Sat Oct 11 20:43:21 2003 guest - Ticket created [Reply]
> [Comment]
>
> Subject: Review date field
>
> It would be nice to have a "review" field for each node, which would be a
> date field,
> set by default to, say 6 months in the future. This could be overriden by
> authors, or
> possibly by specific categories (some sorts of entries might need more
> regular
> reviewing). You'd then be able to go to a page of nodes that are due for
> reviewing.
>
> This would help prevent entries from becoming too stale.
>
>
> Download (untitled) 392b
> Sun Oct 12 02:36:48 2003 KAKE - Correspondence
> added [Reply] [Comment]
>
> Not really my itch (and not an actual bug) - please send a patch though!
>
>
> Download (untitled) 73b
> Sun Oct 12 02:36:49 2003 KAKE - Status changed
> from new to resolved
> Sun Oct 12 06:54:12 2003 guest - Correspondence
> added [Reply] [Comment]
>
> [KAKE - Sun Oct 12 02:36:48 2003]:
>
> > Not really my itch (and not an actual bug) - please send a patch
> > though!
>
> Hence I marked it as a wishlist item. While I can understand you not
> being interested in it, I don't understand why you closed the bug.
>
> As for the patch, as I've explained I'm simply not up to speed with
> understanding the code that drives OpenGuides at the moment so it won't
> be immediate. However if/when I do I'll certainly be looking to be
> constructive, which is part of the reason I filed the bug!
>
>
> Download (untitled) 516b
> Sun Oct 12 06:54:13 2003 RT_System - Status
> changed from resolved to open
> Sun Oct 12 09:32:45 2003 KAKE - Correspondence
> added [Reply] [Comment]
>
> [guest - Sun Oct 12 06:54:12 2003]:
> > Hence I marked it as a wishlist item. While I can understand you not
> > being interested in it, I don't understand why you closed the bug.
>
> I closed it because I'm not planning to do anything about it, and I'd
> rather only have things that I do plan to do "on my radar". I'll leave
> it open since you want it so, though.
>
> Kake
>
>
>
> Download (untitled) 366b
> Fri Jun 10 07:59:40 2005 DOM - Taken
New description:
Sat Oct 11 20:43:21 2003 guest - Ticket created [Reply]
[Comment]
Subject: Review date field
It would be nice to have a "review" field for each node, which would be a
date field,
set by default to, say 6 months in the future. This could be overriden by
authors, or
possibly by specific categories (some sorts of entries might need more
regular
reviewing). You'd then be able to go to a page of nodes that are due for
reviewing.
This would help prevent entries from becoming too stale.
Download (untitled) 392b
Sun Oct 12 02:36:48 2003 KAKE - Correspondence
added [Reply] [Comment]
Not really my itch (and not an actual bug) - please send a patch though!
Download (untitled) 73b
Sun Oct 12 02:36:49 2003 KAKE - Status changed from
new to resolved
Sun Oct 12 06:54:12 2003 guest - Correspondence
added [Reply] [Comment]
[KAKE - Sun Oct 12 02:36:48 2003]:
> Not really my itch (and not an actual bug) - please send a patch
> though!
Hence I marked it as a wishlist item. While I can understand you not
being interested in it, I don't understand why you closed the bug.
As for the patch, as I've explained I'm simply not up to speed with
understanding the code that drives OpenGuides at the moment so it won't
be immediate. However if/when I do I'll certainly be looking to be
constructive, which is part of the reason I filed the bug!
Download (untitled) 516b
Sun Oct 12 06:54:13 2003 RT_System - Status changed
from resolved to open
Sun Oct 12 09:32:45 2003 KAKE - Correspondence
added [Reply] [Comment]
[guest - Sun Oct 12 06:54:12 2003]:
> Hence I marked it as a wishlist item. While I can understand you not
> being interested in it, I don't understand why you closed the bug.
I closed it because I'm not planning to do anything about it, and I'd
rather only have things that I do plan to do "on my radar". I'll leave
it open since you want it so, though.
Kake
Download (untitled) 366b
Fri Jun 10 07:59:40 2005 DOM - Taken
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/1>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#30: Trac should support "Recent Changes" Ticket query
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: ChristopherSchmidt | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Keywords:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Right now, with no way to see which tickets have been touched most
recently, in order to see which tickets have new comments, it's neccesary
to click through each ticket.
This is suboptimal.
http://urchin.earth.li/mailman/listinfo/openguides-tickets does provide an
archive, which is very useful, however, having a built in Report might be
more helpful.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/30>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#32: Add "SVN" as a version tag
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: crschmidt(a)crschmidt.net | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Some bugs will only present themselves in svn. Add a "Subversion" or svn
tag to the version dropdown. (Brought on by ticket #31.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/32>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#31: Node.tt Broken
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: crschmidt(a)crschmidt.net | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Commit 712 breaks node.tt, there is no [% END %] block after the
Try/Catch.
There is also some broken HTML in node.tt from commit 699.
Commit 699 has no effect, since CGI::Wiki apparently always prefills the
content with <pre> </pre>, but that's an issue for another day.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/31>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#28: Missing reference to wiki xmlns.
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dom | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version: 0.51
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Comment (by Earle Martin):
>The fact that feedvalidator does not consider these feeds to be valid is
in
> violation of the specification to my understandig of it
As far as I can see there's nothing wrong with the namespace either. On
the other hand,
> The dc:date fields are not in W3CDTF, nor is the content-type correct.
Right. The former is a bug in CGI::Wiki::Plugin::RSS::ModWiki. The latter
is a bug in OpenGuides::RDF. I'm on both.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/28>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#11: Edit page category/locale selection
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dom | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by ChristopherSchmidt):
* cc: => crschmidt(a)crschmidt.net
Comment:
Okay, so I've tossed something for this together on the Boston OpenGuides
site.
* Created CGI::Wiki::Plugin:: Summariser, for generating metadata summary
lists, http://crschmidt.net/projects/Summariser.pm
* Added some code to wiki.cgi in edit_node():
{{{
my $summariser = CGI::Wiki::Plugin::Summariser->new;
$wiki->register_plugin( plugin => $summariser );
my @categories = $summariser->metadata_list( type => 'Category' );
my @locales = $summariser->metadata_list( type => 'Locale' );
my %tt_vars = ( global_categories => \@categories,
global_locales => \@locales,
...
}}}
* Added some code to edit_form.tt:
{{{
[% FOREACH category = global_categories %]
<a href='#'
onclick="javascript:d=document.getElementById('categories');d.value =
d.value + '[% category %]\n'; return false;">
[% category %]
</a> *
[% END %]
}}}
and the same for locales.
It's not a *clean* solution by any means, but it works, and should get
anyone else who's interested in attacking the problem a running start.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/11>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#27: There is no manual for OpenGuides
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: earle | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ChristopherSchmidt):
Which is now http://dev.openguides.org/wiki/Manual
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/27>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project
#12: Mandatory comment field
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: dom | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ChristopherSchmidt):
I don't feel that this should be a requirement in general, and if it
becomes one, I will remove it. If I'm simply slightly modifying a
geolocation, I have no interest in typing in an edit comment.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/12>
OpenGuides <http://openguides.org/>
The OpenGuides city guides project