15 Apr
2012
15 Apr
'12
6:37 p.m.
I am really confused by the "Missing metadata" search on the Oxford OpenGuide:
http://oxford.openguides.org/wiki/?action=show_missing_metadata
The search form says:
Metadata Type: [...select...]
Metadata Value: ...... _Optional, eg 'pub' when metadata value is Category_
Exclude Locales: []
Exclude Categories: []
It's the Metadata Value field, and the note after it, that's confusing me. If the
metadata *value* is "Category", where is it telling me that I can put (e.g.)
'pub'?
If the metadata *type* is "Category", and I put 'pub' in the metadata
*value* field,
then that implies I'm searching for things which are missing the Category
'pub'...
which doesn't sound very useful?
Sorry if I'm being dim here, but I don't think I can be the only one who'll be
confused by this! (Indeed Owen says he doesn't get it either... so maybe it's
just
something that you need a bit more sleep to understand? ;-)
Jx
15 Apr
15 Apr
8:09 p.m.
On Sun 15 Apr 2012, Janet McKnight <janetmck(a)chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
If the metadata *type* is "Category", and I
put 'pub' in the metadata
*value* field, then that implies I'm searching for things which are
missing the Category 'pub'... which doesn't sound very useful?
As far as I can tell from looking at the code, yes, this is what it
does - it finds you everything that isn't in Category: Pub. I can't
think of a reason to want to do this either, but if Nick Burch (who
coded this feature) is still around, perhaps he could give us an
example of a use case.
Kake
16 Apr
16 Apr
9:36 a.m.
On Sun 15 Apr 2012, Kake <kake(a)earth.li> wrote:
As far as I can tell from looking at the code, yes,
this is what it
does - it finds you everything that isn't in Category: Pub. I can't
think of a reason to want to do this either, but if Nick Burch (who
coded this feature) is still around, perhaps he could give us an
example of a use case.
That would be great. :-) Can I also give examples of the sorts of things
I want to use the "missing metadata" search for, in case it's ever possible
to add the necessary functionality?
Simple search:
* everything which is missing an X, for every value of X (at the moment
I can find everything without a postcode but not everything without a
web address -- seems a bit arbitrary unless there's something I'm missing
about the way the database works?)
Two-faceted search (if that's what you call it):
* everything in category/locale X which is missing a Y, e.g.
- everything in Locale:Donnington which is missing grid refs
- everything in Locale:Rose_Hill which is missing a photo
- everything in Category:Pubs which is missing a website
- everything in Category:Cafes which is missing opening hours
That's about it -- I could come up with more complicated searches &
probably use cases for them, but the above are the sorts of search that
I find myself wanting to do *all the time*, when I have a small amount
of time & I want to be able to create a clearly-defined mini-project eg
"Let's see if I can get everything in Donnington grid-referenced" or
"Let's see if I can google for websites/addresses/etc for all the cafes
in the centre" or "I'm going to be in Locale X on Tuesday with half an
hour to spare, which things still need photos?"
I should add that I know this sort of search isn't trivial & I am no good
at writing them! So I don't mean to whinge about what's there, just to say
that this is what I'd like if possible. Also, I would quite like a pony,
kthx. :-)
Jx
3:58 p.m.
On Sun 15 Apr 2012, Kake <kake(a)earth.li> wrote:
> As far as I can tell from looking at the code,
yes, this is what it
> does - it finds you everything that isn't in Category: Pub. I can't
> think of a reason to want to do this either, but if Nick Burch (who
> coded this feature) is still around, perhaps he could give us an
> example of a use case.
On Mon 16 Apr 2012, Janet McKnight <janetmck(a)chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
That would be great. :-)
I should point out that I don't know if Nick _is_ still around! If not,
perhaps Dom is still in touch with him (or indeed can remember discussion
of this feature, though it's 6 years since it was implemented).
* everything which is missing an X, for every value
of X (at the moment
I can find everything without a postcode but not everything without a
web address -- seems a bit arbitrary unless there's something I'm missing
about the way the database works?)
It seems a bit arbitrary to me too, and in fact you can munge the URL
to do what you want, e.g.
http://oxford.openguides.org/wiki/?action=show_missing_metadata&metadat…
so it's just a restriction of the interface. I don't know if that was
on purpose.
* everything in category/locale X which is missing a
Y, e.g.
- everything in Locale:Donnington which is missing grid refs
- everything in Locale:Rose_Hill which is missing a photo
- everything in Category:Pubs which is missing a website
- everything in Category:Cafes which is missing opening hours
Yes, these would be useful, as would be visualising the results on a
map instead of as a list.
Do you think you could have a go at raising a ticket for these
enhancements? bob recently did some much-needed triage on the bug
database, which has made me much more likely to actually look at the
reps there. If you don't already have a Trac account, there are
instructions for registering here:
http://dev.openguides.org/wiki/AboutThisTracInstall
Kake
4:19 p.m.
On Mon 16 Apr 2012, Kake <kake(a)earth.li> wrote:
Ah, brilliant! In that case surely it would be easy to add the other things
to the drop-down menu?
I don't have an account AFAIR, so yes, I will a) register for a Trac
account, and b) raise a ticket for each of these requests (as I think
the first one is a minor fix & the second is a more significant change
to the search functionality), when I get the tuits.
Thanks!
Jx
I should point out that I don't know if Nick _is_
still around!
AFAIK he is, for some values of "around"; dunno if he's on this list
though!
* everything
which is missing an X, for every value of X (at the moment
I can find everything without a postcode but not everything without a
web address -- seems a bit arbitrary unless there's something I'm missing
about the way the database works?)
It seems a bit arbitrary to me too, and in fact you can munge the URL
to do what you want, e.g.
http://oxford.openguides.org/wiki/?action=show_missing_metadata&metadat…
* everything
in category/locale X which is missing a Y [...]
Do you think you could have a go at raising a ticket for these
enhancements? bob recently did some much-needed triage on the bug
database, which has made me much more likely to actually look at the
reps there. If you don't already have a Trac account, there are
instructions for registering here:
http://dev.openguides.org/wiki/AboutThisTracInstall
4:29 p.m.
On Mon 16 Apr 2012, Janet McKnight <janetmck(a)chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
Ah, brilliant! In that case surely it would be easy to
add the other things
to the drop-down menu?
Yep - I think that's all that needs doing in this case. I would do it
in svn right this instant if I weren't in the middle of another change!
I don't have an account AFAIR, so yes, I will a)
register for a Trac
account, and b) raise a ticket for each of these requests (as I think
the first one is a minor fix & the second is a more significant change
to the search functionality), when I get the tuits.
Great - thank you!
Kake
3948
days inactive
3949
days old
openguides-oxford@lists.openguides.org
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Janet McKnight -
Kake