On Tue 13 Mar 2012, Janet McKnight <janetmck(a)chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
Looks good to me (my CSS is out-of-date -- I'm
assuming classes with
':' in are generally understood by browsers?).
I was hoping someone would tell me if this isn't the case :) I'm now
thinking though that actually it would probably be safer to use
underscores instead, since colons do have special meaning in stylesheets.
Having these classes would also mean we could do
having big clear icons for things that you might want to see at a
glance eg 'has disabled access', 'has baby changing facilities', etc.
Aside: Owen has observed that there are two (or
different types of category: 'is X' (eg 'Cafes') and 'has X' (eg
'Baby Changing Facilities').
Yep. On RGL, the former are plural ("Category Pubs") and the latter
are singular ("Category Beer Garden"). This wasn't entirely on
purpose, it's just the way things mostly turned out, so I decided to
make it a deliberate policy (albeit an unstated one) for the sake of
On the other hand, we could then differentiate between
the use of 'Cafes'
to mean 'is a cafe' (eg G&Ds) and 'has a cafe' (eg Waterstones). If
I'm not sure we do care - does this distinction really matter in a
[Goth/Gay guides etc]
I think it's best done elsewhere.
Goodgood. Are you happy to delete them or should we wait & see if
anybody else on here objects?
Let's wait a bit and see if anyone else has an opinion. I have put a note
in my diary to sort it out in a few weeks if it proves uncontroversial.