On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:36:43AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
In hindsight, much of this licence was a mistake; I've just updated it somewhat, to be closer (read: almost identical) to what London have.
[1] Actually I'm not that sure about this bit, because it means we can't include other suitably-licensed work in the guide at all. Nottingham have the take-all-ownership line, London don't.
And what a fool I was!
(Oh, and I've moved to v2.0 of the CC licence, too)
James.