It turns out I forgot all about this list. See below for discusison
of the future of cambridge.openguides.org.
Cheers,
Dominic.
----- Forwarded message from Dominic Hargreaves <dom(a)earth.li> -----
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 21:47:02 +0000
From: Dominic Hargreaves <dom(a)earth.li>
To: OpenGuides software developers' list <openguides-dev(a)lists.openguides.org>
Subject: Re: [OGDev] A batch of abandoned Open Guides
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:41:38AM +0000, Kake wrote:
> On Tue 06 Dec 2016, Dominic Hargreaves <dom(a)earth.li> wrote:
> > As I'm in the process of moving the config for the server in question,
> > I'm looking at whether to migrate the following sites:
> >
> > http://copenhagen.openguides.org/
> > http://isle-of-wight.openguides.org/
> > http://north-devon.openguides.org/wiki/
> > http://portsmouth.openguides.org/
> > http://swindon.openguides.org/
> >
> > These are all sites which seem to have very little genuine content,
> > and (where edits are enabled) are sadly swamped by spam.
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I wasn't aware some of those sites even
> still existed! As a local historian, I would argue that keeping some
> of these online but with the spam removed, edits disabled, and a clear
> banner saying that they're no longer being updated might be the best
> way to deal with the issue. For example, this page:
> http://north-devon.openguides.org/wiki/?Terrace_Tapas_Bar might seem
> useless, but actually I've made use of similar comments in my own
> local history articles.
>
> Conversely, the Isle of Wight guide does seem not to have any real
> content, so I see no reason to keep it.
>
> It's up to you, though, since you're the one who would have to do the
> work of migration. Another option could be to clean up the spam and
> then make sure everything's in the Internet Archive before deleting
> the sites, though this makes it harder for a websearch to reveal the info.
If there was any significant volume of content, or someone interested
in keeping it running, I can put the effort in, but otherwise, I'm not
sure I have the spare energy. (The owner of North Devon for example
emailed me privately to say it should go).
> > This site:
> >
> > http://cambridge.openguides.org/
> >
> > has quite a lot of spam but also a reasonable amount of
> > genuine content, even if not very up-to-date.
>
> I pretty much gave up on spamtrapping on the Cambridge guide because
> it was non-trivial to update the spamcatcher module. Oxford seems to
> be doing OK, though - is that all manual or is someone keeping the
> spamcatcher module up to date? If the latter, could the two guides
> share a spamcatcher module?
Oxford uses an Akismet plugin:
http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/tmp/Akismet.pm.txt
I've just set Cambridge up to use that too.
Dominic.
--
OpenGuides-Dev mailing list - OpenGuides-Dev(a)lists.openguides.org
http://lists.openguides.org/mailman/listinfo/openguides-dev
----- End forwarded message -----
Hello people,
Sorry for the delay getting here. I'm keen to help out here (many of the
very old photos taken with a useless camera of pubs and colleges were my
own work a long while ago). I'm famously disorganised and episodic,
though, so I'm not much of an organiser, I'm not even much of a member,
though I do have epic wiki binges from time to time. I hope I can be
some use despite these things as I think this is a brilliant project!
Dan.
Hi all,
Also a quick hello from me - I'm Cambridge based, and am CAMRA's current
press officer. I'm also involved with various other bits an pieces
around, but hope to keep the pub pages more up to date.
Neil
Hi all,
I thought I'd set the ball rolling with a quick intro. I'm in Cambridge
and may have some spare time on my hands in the near future, though any
work I do on OGC is likely to be reactive editing of things I spot around
town rather than proactive geekery. I'm subscribed to the digest version
of this list, so I'll try not confuse replies, etc.
Cheers,
Lucy