OpenGuides-London

openguides-london@lists.openguides.org

230 discussions

انضم لحساب Canva Pro مجانًا الآن
by jibl3azzmenusa＠gmail.com 30 Sep '25

30 Sep '25

انضم الآن إلى حساب Canva Pro مجانًا عبر رابط الدعوة المخصص للمعلمين والطلاب في 2025، واستفد من جميع المزايا المدفوعة دون أي تكلفة. في هذا المقال نوضح لك كيفية الحصول على دعوة مجانية لحساب Canva Pro Edu، وما الذي يميزه عن الحسابات الأخرى، والخطوات العملية للتسجيل. https://www.targir.com/2025/02/canva-pro.html ما هو Canva Pro؟ Canva منصة تصميم مشهورة عالميًا تتيح إنشاء عروض تقديمية، ملصقات، منشورات اجتماعية، فيديوهات وغير ذلك بسهولة. الحساب المجاني يوفر أدوات وقوالب محدودة، بينما يقدم Canva Pro مكتبة ضخمة من الصور والفيديوهات، أدوات احترافية مثل إزالة الخلفية، وتخزين سحابي بسعة كبيرة. أنواع الحسابات الحساب المجاني: يتيح الوصول لآلاف القوالب وصور ورسومات محدودة، مع 5 جيجا تخزين. مناسب للمبتدئين. Canva Pro: مدفوع يوفر أكثر من 100 مليون صورة، قوالب متميزة، 1 تيرابايت تخزين، وأدوات مثل تغيير مقاسات التصميم. Canva Teams: مصمم للمؤسسات، مع مزايا تعاون فوري وتخصيص العلامة التجارية. Canva Pro Edu: مجاني للمعلمين والطلاب، يحتوي على جميع ميزات Canva Pro بالإضافة إلى أدوات تعليمية. كيف تحصل على Canva Pro Edu مجانًا؟ – التسجيل عبر رابط دعوة رسمي خاص بالتعليم. – إنشاء حساب جديد أو استخدام بريدك التعليمي إن توفر. – بعد قبول الدعوة، يتحول حسابك تلقائيًا إلى Canva Pro Edu مجاني بكامل المزايا. ماذا تحتاج للتسجيل؟ – أن تكون معلمًا أو طالبًا بمؤسسة تعليمية. – بريد إلكتروني مرتبط بالتعليم (مثل edu). – الانضمام عبر رابط دعوة نشط. هل يمكن الحصول على Canva Pro بطرق أخرى؟ نعم، هناك نسخة تجريبية مجانية لمدة 30 يومًا متاحة للجميع عبر الموقع الرسمي. خلال هذه الفترة تستمتع بجميع المزايا، ويمكنك إلغاء الاشتراك قبل انتهائها لتجنب الرسوم. أما الحصول على Canva Pro شخصي دائمًا بشكل مجاني فغير ممكن إلا عبر الدعوة التعليمية. أهم المزايا التي يقدمها Canva Pro Edu مجانًا – مكتبة تضم أكثر من 100 مليون صورة ورسوم وفيديوهات. – أكثر من 600 ألف قالب احترافي. – أدوات متقدمة مثل إزالة الخلفية وتغيير مقاسات التصاميم. – تخزين سحابي 1 تيرابايت. – إمكانية العمل الجماعي مع الطلاب والزملاء على مشاريع مشتركة. لماذا تختار Canva Pro Edu؟ هذا الحساب يمنحك جميع أدوات Canva Pro دون تكلفة، وهو مثالي للمدرسين لإعداد دروس تفاعلية، وللطلاب لإنشاء مشاريع وعروض احترافية. يساعدك على رفع جودة أعمالك ويوفر موارد ضخمة جاهزة للاستخدام. خاتمة إذا كنت طالبًا أو معلمًا، فإن أفضل طريقة للحصول على Canva Pro مجانًا هي عبر رابط الدعوة إلى Canva Pro Edu. بهذه الخطوة ستفتح لك جميع الأدوات المميزة دون أي رسوم. سجّل الآن واستفد من فرصة مذهلة تتيح لك تطوير تصاميمك التعليمية والشخصية، والوصول إلى مستوى احترافي باستخدام Canva Pro Edu في 2025.

1 0

شهادة الأبوة في المغرب
by jibl3azzmenusa＠gmail.com 30 Sep '25

30 Sep '25

شهادة الأبوة في المغرب

1 0

Re: [OGL] [OGDev] There was a release; also, time passed
by Dominic Hargreaves 20 May '20

20 May '20

Oops, time passed (anyone else finding that's happening these days?) On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:43:47PM +0100, Kake wrote: > On Wed 29 Apr 2020, Dominic Hargreaves <dom(a)earth.li> wrote: > > Neither cambridge, london or oxford are being actively used or > > maintained by anyone, as far as I know, for many years, so it's > > probably time I (not-so?)-gracefully turn them all off. > > I have a feeling I’ve made this plea here before, but speaking as a > local historian, I don’t think these websites should just be deleted. > > I agree that it needs to be made very clear that the information isn’t > current (didn’t london once have a banner at the top of every page > saying this?), but all three of the above are useful sources for local > historians, and surely london is also of some interest to historians > of technology. London has a message on the front page, but I think that is not as useful. True, it wouldn't be hard to update the templates, so I'll do that soonish, and try and tidy up Oxford and Cambridge (spoiler alert, when I started to do this the other week, I ended up breaking the database, so it's currently offline awaiting time to resurrect it). > bob is happy to host the sites if Dom doesn’t want to do it any more, > and if bob is hosting them then I’m happy to admin them. If they are truly read-only, and can be cleaned up, there overhead in running them is small. But on the other hand, running the software is probably not the most effective way to set up an long-lived archive. A static HTML export, either hosted locally, or being hosted by one of the options discussed below, would make more sense. Something to think about, anyway. On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:14:18PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On 29/04/2020 13:43, Kake wrote: > > On Wed 29 Apr 2020, Dominic Hargreaves <dom(a)earth.li> wrote: > > > Neither cambridge, london or oxford are being actively used or > > > maintained by anyone, as far as I know, for many years, so it's > > > probably time I (not-so?)-gracefully turn them all off. > > I have a feeling I’ve made this plea here before, but speaking as a > > local historian, I don’t think these websites should just be deleted. > > Did you know that the British Library has a programme for archiving > websites? Provided that they are primarily original-content-driven then they > want to archive even personal sites (they're archiving my cricket blog > <https://larvalstageumpire.sport.blog/>, for example), so Openguides sites > would certainly qualify. They may already be aware of the OG sites, but if > not they're happy to take nominations from the public for sites to archive. > See here: > https://www.bl.uk/collection-guides/uk-web-archive This is very interesting, although it didn't strike me as being the most accessible set of sites (quite a lot of clicking around to find content that was actually available to the public). I was going to suggest the archive.org as being good enough. Cheers Dominic

2 1

There was a release; also, time passed
by Dominic Hargreaves 29 Apr '20

29 Apr '20

I just noticed through random chance that there was a new release back in January: https://metacpan.org/release/OpenGuides I mention in case anyone is interested. It's been a very long time since I even thought about OpenGuides, I'm afraid. But since for the first time since I can remember I got emailed by london.openguides.org (with a user who was mainly trying ot leave a message about how out of date everything is). And according to my email archives it's being in "wind down" state for about a decade... I think it accidentally regained editability after a sever migration a few years ago. Neither cambridge, london or oxford are being actively used or maintained by anyone, as far as I know, for many years, so it's probably time I (not-so?)-gracefully turn them all off.

2 1

Questions asked of the Open Guide to London
by THOMAS ULRICH 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

Is there still a swatch shop at victoria station Regards Tom

2 1

london.openguides.org frozen
by Dominic Hargreaves 28 Feb '10

28 Feb '10

After various discussion on openguides-dev, and a silence on this list when I suggested it recently, I've now disabled edits on london.openguides.org and put up a warning that content may be out of date. I've also put in a robots.txt to tell search engines not to spider the site. Readers may be interested in another London guide running on OpenGuides, http://london.randomness.org.uk/ Regards, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)

1 0

London Open Guides
by Leigh Simpson 24 Jan '10

24 Jan '10

Hi there, Today I was trying to update a page on the London Open Guide (http://london.openguides.org/wiki/?Liverpool_Street_Station), but keep running into the error message "Not saved - Sorry; that looks like spam. If it isn't spam, please contact the guide administrator." I was hoping to change a paragraph from this: The lower concourse extends westwards into a shopping centre, underneath a bus terminus. Railtrack have a [http://www.networkrail.co.uk/Stations/stations/liverpoolstreet/Documents/Li verpoolStreet.pdf map of the shops] in the station. Notable shops include two WH Smiths, the usual [[Fast Food|junk food]] suspects ([[Burger King]] and [[McDonalds]]), two Costa Coffees and on the upper level a record shop (Helter Skelter). To this: The lower concourse extends westwards into a shopping centre, underneath a bus terminus. Network Rail have a [http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/For%20Passengers/Station%20Maps/4512 _Liverpool%20Street%20Station%20Map.pdf map of the shops] in the station. Notable shops include two WH Smiths, the usual [[Fast Food|junk food]] suspects ([[Burger King]] and [[McDonalds]]), two Costa Coffees and on the upper level a record shop (Helter Skelter). Although I appreciate that it's probably hard to keep spam to a manageable level, it's slightly irksome to be prevented from contributing a genuine edit in this way. More irritating is the request to contact the guide administrator without providing any contact details to allow one to do so! Although I'm bloody-minded enough to have sought out this address to let you know of this problem I suspect that many others won't be and will simply give up, which is a shame and might prevent the guide becoming even better than it already is. Regards, Leigh Simpson

2 1

Re: [OGL] London Open Guides
by Leigh Simpson 20 Jan '10

20 Jan '10

Hello again, Now I find that I can't save modifications to the page for King's Cross (http://london.openguides.org/wiki/?King's_Cross_St._Pancras_Station) as the Latitude and Longitude are improperly formatted (try clicking "Edit" then "Save" directly). Sadly, since I didn't touch these I've no idea what they should be. Regards, Leigh Simpson > -----Original Message----- > From: Leigh Simpson [mailto:lists@simpleigh.com] > Sent: 20 January 2010 10:09 > To: 'openguides-london(a)lists.openguides.org' > Subject: London Open Guides > > Hi there, > > Today I was trying to update a page on the London Open Guide > (http://london.openguides.org/wiki/?Liverpool_Street_Station), but keep > running into the error message "Not saved - Sorry; that looks like > spam. If it isn't spam, please contact the guide administrator." > > I was hoping to change a paragraph from this: > > The lower concourse extends westwards into a shopping centre, > underneath a bus terminus. Railtrack have a > [http://www.networkrail.co.uk/Stations/stations/liverpoolstreet/Documen > ts/LiverpoolStreet.pdf map of the shops] in the station. Notable shops > include two WH Smiths, the usual [[Fast Food|junk food]] suspects > ([[Burger King]] and [[McDonalds]]), two Costa Coffees and on the upper > level a record shop (Helter Skelter). > > To this: > > The lower concourse extends westwards into a shopping centre, > underneath a bus terminus. Network Rail have a > [http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/For%20Passengers/Station%20Maps > /4512_Liverpool%20Street%20Station%20Map.pdf map of the shops] in the > station. Notable shops include two WH Smiths, the usual [[Fast > Food|junk food]] suspects ([[Burger King]] and [[McDonalds]]), two > Costa Coffees and on the upper level a record shop (Helter Skelter). > > Although I appreciate that it's probably hard to keep spam to a > manageable level, it's slightly irksome to be prevented from > contributing a genuine edit in this way. More irritating is the request > to contact the guide administrator without providing any contact > details to allow one to do so! Although I'm bloody-minded enough to > have sought out this address to let you know of this problem I suspect > that many others won't be and will simply give up, which is a shame and > might prevent the guide becoming even better than it already is. > > Regards, > > Leigh Simpson > >

1 0

london.openguides.org back up / list moves
by Dominic Hargreaves 03 Jul '08

03 Jul '08

Hello, For those of you who may not know me, I'm part of the team of people who look after the overall openguides project and software. I have this evening brought london.openguides.org back online on a new host, using the database dump from last year that Earle gave me. This is catalysed both by Earle leaving the project and a discussion that arose at the pub the other weekend - essentially the point was made that there is still a nasty fork between RGL and london.openguides.org, and that there was also much content that had been put on the latter that was temporarily lost. I therefore decided it was best to get the latter back up as soon as possible, if nothing else so the content could be taken from there and put on RGL. I'm not able to decide for people which guide to use, and I'm also not a Londoner, so I'm only getting involved as as custodian, but I do think that it would be good to look at the situation and decide whether making two London guides is still the best thing, or whether they should be merged again somehow. Please discuss! Cheers, Dominic. P.S. Please also note that the lists have moved to a new host today as well. This means that http://lists.openguides.org/ URLs may not work for you for a day or so until the DNS TTL expires. I apologies that I wasn't able to avoid this, due to the coordination issues of migrating the list quickly. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)

3 5

OGL suggestion
by Kake L Pugh 12 Feb '08

12 Feb '08

Hello. I know Earle is working on getting OGL back up, and I do understand that this is not an easy task, but in the meantime I'm a bit concerned that people are following old links to OGL, seeing the "we're having a problem" thing, and thinking that OpenGuides is dead. I've been asked about this by two people in the last month. I know there have been a lot of Open Guides that have come and gone, and are now no more, but I do think OGL is kind of special in that we've always promoted it as our "flagship". I was wondering if the "we're having a problem" page could maybe have a link to RGL, perhaps along the lines of "in the meantime, you may want to check out the Randomness Guide to London, another London wiki running on the same software as OGL". I can see that there's no direct benefit to OGL from this, but I do think it would benefit the OpenGuides project as a whole. Kake

1 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

OpenGuides-London