I have spotted a rather long URL at
http://london.openguides.org/index.cgi?Benugohttp://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=531777&y=182152&z=0&sv=EC1V+4JS
&st=2&tl=Postcode+EC1V+4JS&pc=EC1V+4JS&
mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf
This rather messes the format of the page - at least under Firefox the
"frame" (is there a proper name for this) stretches to fit the long URL.
This leads me to wonder
- is or should there be a standard way of representing MAP
references. I would prefer the grid ref to the postcode and certainly
not both.
- could the underlying software provide a built in map ref construct.
[531777,182152].
- could the software truncate a long URL when displaying on teh screen.
Tried to look at RDF for this page HYPERLINK
"http://london.openguides.org/index.cgi?action=index;index_type=category;ind
ex_value=Live%20Music"http://london.openguides.org/index.cgi?action=index;in
dex_type=category;index_value=Live%20Music
And got Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sorry! Something went wrong. Please contact the Wiki administrator at
HYPERLINK
"mailto:openguides-london@openguides.org"openguides-london(a)openguides.org
and quote the following error message:
No valid node name supplied at /home/earle/downlode.org/perl/lib/CGI/Wiki.pm
line 220
HYPERLINK "http://london.openguides.org/index.cgi"Return to the Wiki home
page
Michela Ledwidge
Director
MOD Films
http://modfilms.com
+44 (0) 207 723 4764
+61 (0) 415 644 781
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005
If you search for c2c you get a rather eclectic list of places.
Curiously those that score 2 are not relevant (unless I miss something)
# Kentish Town Station (score: 2)
# Liverpool Street Station (score: 2)
# Thurrock Lakeside (score: 2)
# Gloucester Road (score: 2)
# Category Tube (score: 2)
# Natural History Museum (score: 2)
# Kensington Central Library, W8 7RX (score: 1)
# Cable Street (score: 1)
# Limehouse Station (score: 1)
# Fenchurch Street Station (score: 1)
# London, Tilbury And Southend Line (score: 1)
# Upminster Station (score: 1)
I am interested in running a Wiki and am perplexed by the range of Wikis
available.
My preference would be to use one where I know people involved.
I am rather confused about the boundary between Openguides software and
CGI::Wiki.
If I want to run a Wiki that is not actually an guide , would Openguides
software help me or just give me an overhead I didn't need. Conversely
does CGI::Wiki work by itself or does it need other software to make it
work.
Another way of asking this might be - is there benefit in me testing the
install procedure of Openguides even if I don't need all the
functionality of Openguides at this moment. I am running on Debian.
If there is a more suitable list/forum on which to discuss this, please
let me know.
Thanks
A
Hi
I have noticed that http://openguides.org/mm/listinfo/openguides-london
contains some embedded HTML
The source this has
<P><p>This list discusses the continuing development of the Open Guide to London, part of the <a href="http://openguides.org/">OpenGuides</a> network.</p></P>
Mark gave a talk (at the last London.pm tech meeting) about doubly encoded entities. Looks like we have a sibling problem to this - encoded HTML tags.
Andrew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openguides-london-bounces(a)openguides.org
> [mailto:openguides-london-bounces@openguides.org]On Behalf Of
> Rev Simon
> Rumble
> Sent: 06 January 2005 17:16
> To: Discussion of the Open Guide to London.
> Subject: Re: [OpenGuides-London] Template bug
>
>
> This one time, at band camp, IvorW wrote:
> > This is London specific, as far as I can tell.
>
> Version-specific, perhaps?
The templates on the London site have been hacked by Earle.
The Kakemirror site has the originals