OpenGuides-London October 2003

openguides-london@lists.openguides.org

7 participants
4 discussions

[OpenGuides-London] Some UI changes
by Earle Martin 26 Oct '03

26 Oct '03

I've made some look and feel changes to the site along the lines of what Peter Sergeant suggested in this message: http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20031020/022364.html What do you think? -- # Earle Martin http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?EarleMartin $a="f695a9a2176a7dd1618af6649896ee10f05ea986de18af6277e9a1d8ef4696644569a1d". "8ef46961ae1e64277e9896eea7d92ea8003e9a1d8ef4696f6950";$b="8ALB6AIA4.BA2";$c= join"",unpack"C*",$b;$c=~s/7/2/g;@b=split"",$c;foreach$d(@b){$e=hex(substr($a ,$f,$d));while(length($e)<8){substr($e,0,0)=0;}print pack"b8",$e;$f+=$d;}

3 6

[OpenGuides-London] Re: Call for Comments - OpenGuides and usability
by Kate L Pugh 23 Oct '03

23 Oct '03

I wrote a little pub search thing for the London OpenGuide. Comments welcome. Is this the kind of thing people would like to see on the site? Here it is on my dev site: http://un.earth.li/~kake/cgi-bin/pubsearch-alpha.cgi Kake

3 7

[OpenGuides-London] More on the accessibility thing
by Kate L Pugh 23 Oct '03

23 Oct '03

A rather perceptive post, forwarded in full from the london.pm discussion. Kake ----- Forwarded message from Simon Wilcox <essuu(a)ourshack.com> ----- From: Simon Wilcox <essuu(a)ourshack.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 15:07:15 +0100 (BST) To: london.pm(a)london.pm.org.realprogrammers.com Subject: Re: Call for Comments - OpenGuides and usability On 22 Oct 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > There are four kinds of people regarding Wikis: I would argue that the technology is irrelevant, There are two kinds of people who might interact with Open Guide: 1. Consumers 2. Producers A successful site will make it easy for consumers to consume and producers to produce. There will always be many more consumers than producers. A *really* successful site will be able to convert consumers into producers. Arguably Open Guide succeeds at none of these things as it only really makes it easy for *producers* to consume as too much pre-knowledge is required to understand and navigate the site and a lot of the early information is aimed at producers. But then, I guess it depends on what you define as "successful". Perhaps we should ask that question - how will we know when Open Guide to London is a success ? Simon. ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

[OpenGuides-London] Google
by Kate L Pugh 11 Oct '03

11 Oct '03

The London OpenGuide doesn't show up when you google for 'London wiki'. It would be nice if it did. Suggestions? Kake

4 7

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

OpenGuides-London October 2003