Hello. At the moment, when you ask for an atom feed of the entire site, it looks something like this:
<entry> <title>Adam And Eve, SW1H 9EX</title> [...] <summary>Add Category Real Ale to GBG pubs. [AutoKake]</summary> <updated>2007-05-04T17:46:28+01:00</updated> <author><name>AutoKake</name></author> [...] </entry>
Since we now have a proper summary field, should we putting its value in here instead of the latest change comment?
Kake
Sounds sensible to me!
Tom.
On 18/06/07, Kake L Pugh kake@earth.li wrote:
Hello. At the moment, when you ask for an atom feed of the entire site, it looks something like this:
<entry> <title>Adam And Eve, SW1H 9EX</title> [...] <summary>Add Category Real Ale to GBG pubs. [AutoKake]</summary> <updated>2007-05-04T17:46:28+01:00</updated> <author><name>AutoKake</name></author> [...] </entry>
Since we now have a proper summary field, should we putting its value in here instead of the latest change comment?
Kake
-- OpenGuides-Dev mailing list - OpenGuides-Dev@lists.openguides.org http://lists.openguides.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openguides-dev
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:08:22PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
Hello. At the moment, when you ask for an atom feed of the entire site, it looks something like this:
<entry> <title>Adam And Eve, SW1H 9EX</title> [...] <summary>Add Category Real Ale to GBG pubs. [AutoKake]</summary> <updated>2007-05-04T17:46:28+01:00</updated> <author><name>AutoKake</name></author> [...] </entry>
Since we now have a proper summary field, should we putting its value in here instead of the latest change comment?
I think there is continuing confusion about what the RSS feeds are feeds of -- the content, or the changes?
If they are feeds of changes, then the summary is not correct -- that's a summary of the node, not of the change.
Boston has always treated them as feeds of nodes, ordered by most recent update. Hence our (my) full-node-text output by default.
So, I'm in favor, but it does mean changing the meaning of these RSS feeds, in my eyes, and I think that should be a consideration in the decision.
Regards,
On Mon 18 Jun 2007, Christopher Schmidt crschmidt@crschmidt.net wrote:
I think there is continuing confusion about what the RSS feeds are feeds of -- the content, or the changes?
Isn't the Recent Changes RSS feed a feed of changes, while the site/category/locale feeds are feeds of the content?
Kake
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:59:38PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
On Mon 18 Jun 2007, Christopher Schmidt crschmidt@crschmidt.net wrote:
I think there is continuing confusion about what the RSS feeds are feeds of -- the content, or the changes?
Isn't the Recent Changes RSS feed a feed of changes, while the site/category/locale feeds are feeds of the content?
That sounds fine to me, though I'll admit it's not how I use them. Where is the 'site' feed located?
Regards,
On Mon 18 Jun 2007, Christopher Schmidt crschmidt@crschmidt.net wrote:
Where is the 'site' feed located?
<site_url>?action=index;format=atom
It's basically the category/locale index with no index_type or index_value. Also works with format=map or indeed no format parameter at all.
Kake
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
On Mon 18 Jun 2007, Christopher Schmidt crschmidt@crschmidt.net wrote:
Where is the 'site' feed located?
<site_url>?action=index;format=atom
It's basically the category/locale index with no index_type or index_value. Also works with format=map or indeed no format parameter at all.
Ah, right, I have to disable those on Boston, else my server gets dead. (Loading all 13,000 nodes into memory to template them results in a 250MB Apache process -- 4 of those will run me out of RAM, 12 of them will run me out of RAM and swap.)
Regards,
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
On Mon 18 Jun 2007, Christopher Schmidt crschmidt@crschmidt.net wrote:
Where is the 'site' feed located?
<site_url>?action=index;format=atom It's basically the category/locale index with no index_type or index_value. Also works with format=map or indeed no format parameter at all.
Ah, right, I have to disable those on Boston, else my server gets dead. (Loading all 13,000 nodes into memory to template them results in a 250MB Apache process -- 4 of those will run me out of RAM, 12 of them will run me out of RAM and swap.)
Can you bung a squid in front of the server and have it only let that query through to the server once an hour or something similar, sending everyone else cached results?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:56:19PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Kake L Pugh wrote:
On Mon 18 Jun 2007, Christopher Schmidt crschmidt@crschmidt.net wrote:
Where is the 'site' feed located?
<site_url>?action=index;format=atom It's basically the category/locale index with no index_type or index_value. Also works with format=map or indeed no format parameter at all.
Ah, right, I have to disable those on Boston, else my server gets dead. (Loading all 13,000 nodes into memory to template them results in a 250MB Apache process -- 4 of those will run me out of RAM, 12 of them will run me out of RAM and swap.)
Can you bung a squid in front of the server and have it only let that query through to the server once an hour or something similar, sending everyone else cached results?
My attempts at squid have always failed miserably. So although it may be technically possible, it's nothing I'm going to bother to do: I've got workarounds that scratch my itches, so I'm fine with things as is. (Keep in mind I'm also running about 9 versions behind at this point, and have thus far failed to make the time to upgrade.)
Regards,
openguides-dev@lists.openguides.org
-
Christopher Schmidt -
David Cantrell -
Kake L Pugh -
Tom Heath