I've moved across the trac tickets that i think are still relevant to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
https://github.com/OpenGuides/OpenGuides/issues?state=open
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:02AM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
I've moved across the trac tickets that i think are still relevant to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
For the tickets that you've moved, could you comment on trac with a link to the github issue and resolve (maybe mark duplicate?) them so that others can see what hasn't been migrated? I don't want to have trac around indefinitely as a source of confusion, so we need to end up with them all resolved becaues they've been moved to github, or resolved invalid or similar if there is no need to keep them open.
Dominic.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:02AM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
I've moved across the trac tickets that i think are still relevant to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
For the tickets that you've moved, could you comment on trac with a link to the github issue and resolve (maybe mark duplicate?) them so that others can see what hasn't been migrated? I don't want to have trac around indefinitely as a source of confusion, so we need to end up with them all resolved becaues they've been moved to github, or resolved invalid or similar if there is no need to keep them open.
Dominic.
So I've resolved as duplicate all the ones ive migrated. ive also closed a few which are part of more meta like tickets. (Search Rewrite and rewriting to use plack)
http://bit.ly/WQ9zmM is a custom query which shows what openguides component tickets are left open.
I personally think these are probably all wontfix but if others feel they want to migrate them they can.
As an aside the issues on github were added in priority order so lower ones are more important currently.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 09:08:10PM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:02AM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
I've moved across the trac tickets that i think are still relevant to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
For the tickets that you've moved, could you comment on trac with a link to the github issue and resolve (maybe mark duplicate?) them so that others can see what hasn't been migrated? I don't want to have trac around indefinitely as a source of confusion, so we need to end up with them all resolved becaues they've been moved to github, or resolved invalid or similar if there is no need to keep them open.
Dominic.
So I've resolved as duplicate all the ones ive migrated. ive also closed a few which are part of more meta like tickets. (Search Rewrite and rewriting to use plack)
http://bit.ly/WQ9zmM is a custom query which shows what openguides component tickets are left open.
I personally think these are probably all wontfix but if others feel they want to migrate them they can.
Thanks. I've migrated some more, and closed some more which we seem to agree are unimportant. There's only one left I wasn't sure of:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/181
'It would be good to have a "diff" view in the preview, like Wikimedia has.'
I'm not particularly interested, but I'd like to hear from Kake on that before rejecting it.
Also, I've removed the ability for authenticated users to file new tickets on trac, at avoid any divergence.
Dominic.
On Mon 25 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves dom@earth.li wrote:
Thanks. I've migrated some more, and closed some more which we seem to agree are unimportant. There's only one left I wasn't sure of:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/181
'It would be good to have a "diff" view in the preview, like Wikimedia has.'
I'm not particularly interested, but I'd like to hear from Kake on that before rejecting it.
I would find this really useful if we had it. I think I'm mainly blocked on implementing it because OpenGuides::Diff needs improving too.
Kake
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:36:08PM +0000, Kake wrote:
On Mon 25 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves dom@earth.li wrote:
Thanks. I've migrated some more, and closed some more which we seem to agree are unimportant. There's only one left I wasn't sure of:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/181
'It would be good to have a "diff" view in the preview, like Wikimedia has.'
I'm not particularly interested, but I'd like to hear from Kake on that before rejecting it.
I would find this really useful if we had it. I think I'm mainly blocked on implementing it because OpenGuides::Diff needs improving too.
Okay, migrated that.
openguides-dev@lists.openguides.org
-
Bob Walker -
Dominic Hargreaves -
Kake