17 Mar
2013
17 Mar
'13
12:37 a.m.
I've moved across the trac tickets that i think are still relevant to
github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket if there
is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
https://github.com/OpenGuides/OpenGuides/issues?state=open
--
bob walker
everything should be purple and bendy
http://randomness.org.uk
17 Mar
17 Mar
11:33 a.m.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:02AM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
I've moved across the trac tickets that i think
are still relevant
to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket
if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
https://github.com/OpenGuides/OpenGuides/issues?state=open
For the tickets that you've moved, could you comment on trac with
a link to the github issue and resolve (maybe mark duplicate?) them
so that others can see what hasn't been migrated? I don't want to have
trac around indefinitely as a source of confusion, so we need to end up
with them all resolved becaues they've been moved to github, or resolved
invalid or similar if there is no need to keep them open.
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
9:08 p.m.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:02AM +0000, Bob Walker
wrote:
So I've resolved as duplicate all the ones ive migrated.
ive also closed a few which are part of more meta like tickets. (Search
Rewrite and rewriting to use plack)
http://bit.ly/WQ9zmM is a custom query which shows what openguides
component tickets are left open.
I personally think these are probably all wontfix but if others feel they
want to migrate them they can.
As an aside the issues on github were added in priority order so lower
ones are more important currently.
--
bob walker
everything should be purple and bendy
http://randomness.org.uk
I've moved across the trac tickets that i
think are still relevant
to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket
if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
https://github.com/OpenGuides/OpenGuides/issues?state=open
For the tickets that you've moved, could you comment on trac with
a link to the github issue and resolve (maybe mark duplicate?) them
so that others can see what hasn't been migrated? I don't want to have
trac around indefinitely as a source of confusion, so we need to end up
with them all resolved becaues they've been moved to github, or resolved
invalid or similar if there is no need to keep them open.
Dominic.
25 Mar
25 Mar
9:30 p.m.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 09:08:10PM +0000, Bob Walker wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
Thanks. I've migrated some more, and closed some more which we seem
to agree are unimportant. There's only one left I wasn't sure of:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/181
'It would be good to have a "diff" view in the preview, like Wikimedia
has.'
I'm not particularly interested, but I'd like to hear from Kake on that
before rejecting it.
Also, I've removed the ability for authenticated users to file new
tickets on trac, at avoid any divergence.
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:37:02AM +0000, Bob
Walker wrote:
So I've resolved as duplicate all the ones ive migrated.
ive also closed a few which are part of more meta like tickets.
(Search Rewrite and rewriting to use plack)
http://bit.ly/WQ9zmM is a custom query which shows what openguides
component tickets are left open.
I personally think these are probably all wontfix but if others feel
they want to migrate them they can. I've moved across the trac tickets that i
think are still relevant
to github issues. Quite a lot of them link back to the trac ticket
if there is a lengthy discussion there.
Ive left quite a few behind because i dont think they matter anymore.
https://github.com/OpenGuides/OpenGuides/issues?state=open
For the tickets that you've moved, could you comment on trac with
a link to the github issue and resolve (maybe mark duplicate?) them
so that others can see what hasn't been migrated? I don't want to have
trac around indefinitely as a source of confusion, so we need to end up
with them all resolved becaues they've been moved to github, or resolved
invalid or similar if there is no need to keep them open.
Dominic.
9:36 p.m.
On Mon 25 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves <dom(a)earth.li> wrote:
Thanks. I've migrated some more, and closed some
more which we seem
to agree are unimportant. There's only one left I wasn't sure of:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/181
'It would be good to have a "diff" view in the preview, like Wikimedia
has.'
I'm not particularly interested, but I'd like to hear from Kake on that
before rejecting it.
I would find this really useful if we had it. I think I'm mainly blocked
on implementing it because OpenGuides::Diff needs improving too.
Kake
9:40 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:36:08PM +0000, Kake wrote:
On Mon 25 Mar 2013, Dominic Hargreaves
<dom(a)earth.li> wrote:
Okay, migrated that.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
Thanks. I've migrated some more, and closed
some more which we seem
to agree are unimportant. There's only one left I wasn't sure of:
http://dev.openguides.org/ticket/181
'It would be good to have a "diff" view in the preview, like Wikimedia
has.'
I'm not particularly interested, but I'd like to hear from Kake on that
before rejecting it.
I would find this really useful if we had it. I think I'm mainly blocked
on implementing it because OpenGuides::Diff needs improving too.
3913
days inactive
3921
days old
openguides-dev@lists.openguides.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bob Walker -
Dominic Hargreaves -
Kake